At a dinner party I confess that I love the reality show Teen Mom. Eyebrows go skyward and the host's college sophomore daughter
goes “ewww,” and then, “ick.” She seems completely repulsed
although when I go on to describe the tribulations of the young,
fertile and unwed it becomes apparent that she is more than a little
familiar with the show. Embarrassed, she confesses to seeing bits of
the program when her “roommate is watching.” Himself, who
thoroughly excoriates me for my addiction to reality shows, weighs in
that, yes indeed, Farrah is a bitch to her mom. Himself reddens when
the assembled turn to him in shock. The professional intellectual
squirms and mutters, “I hear it when she has it on.” The word
“she” is pronounced with a derisive edge. After making eye
contact with Himself and enunciating a request that he perform a
small household chore, I assume he is hearing impaired. I usually
end up doing it by myself. Nevertheless, he is not a auditorilly
challenged when it comes to the trevails of Maci and Amber.
There are so many reality shows that
there are sub-sub genres. From a production standpoint and in a
rotten economy with a zillion channels to fill, these shows are
cheaper to make. But they are indeed made because we do indeed watch. It started back in the 70s with An American
Family. I loved the show but there was a Margaret Mead quality and
PBS provenance that relegated it outside the realm of popular
entertainment. During the writer's strike of 1989, the show Cops,
the first successful mainstream reality show debuted and opened the
floodgates.
There are very few facets of society
that haven't been realitized. Even the technology shunning
Hutterite sect has its own show. It's on the National Geographic
Channel. The erstwhile bastion of intellectual edification has
become quite the bottom feeder. The Hutterites don't have televisions
although some of the sects, called colonies, have some cellphones and
limited Internet access. The young folks have uncannily nailed the
reality show convention. Nineteen year old Claudia is the colony
rebel. She wants to wear modern clothes, date “English” (as
non-Hutterites are called) boys and not be manacled to woman's work.
She is sort of the Hutterite Paris Hilton and she plays to the
camera. The older colonists are stiff and wooden. They repeat a
mantra flatly. “You can't work with the men Claudia” More
fascinating to me than the video of the Hutterites interacting in
front of the camera is the obvious cynicism of the show's creators.
A lot of reality programming
capitalizes on hard economic times. There are at least two shows that
are set in pawn shops. Storage Wars is about the auction of
lockers that have gone into rental arrears. Most of the units are
chock a block with possessions, lost to auction speculators, because
the owners are unable to keep up payments, which run about
$50 per month. There is never a nod to the irony that this default
on personal belongings has spawned such a profitable hit show.
Operation Repo stays on only when I have my hands in meatloaf and am
unable to change the channel. The show, by the way, has become a
huge international franchise. It's such an enormous hit because the
vehicle is never wrested from a mom driving her kids to school or
some poor schlemiel trying to get to work. Cars are taken from the
reprehensible, snotty debutantes and arrogant Hollywood types.
Justice is served. Schadenfreude apparently translates well into
every language.
The thirst for immersion into the lives
of every day people seems insatiable. Movies and fictional
television are escapist entertainment. Actors are more beautiful,
better dressed, wittier than any creature of the real world. People
spend far more time on-line or in front of the television than
engaged in social interaction. The digital age has fomented a
pervasive loneliness and we yearn to connect with real people. And
it is comforting to companion with those who are less beautiful, less
well dressed, highly stupid and who appear on camera to be
staggeringly bereft of self awareness.
Which brings me to two favorite shows
and a pending spin-off which are controversial, and I guess
despicable because they involve children. Nevertheless, when channel
surfing, Dance Moms and Toddlers and Tiaras trump all. I haven't
watched any of the real housewife shows but I presume the boozing,
sniping dance moms are cut from the same cloth. The daughters study
at the Abby Lee Dance Studio, Abby Lee herself being a 300 lb
harridan who heaps abuse on mothers and dancers alike. We forgive the
mothers a bit for forcing their daughters to endure this. When the
moms aren't going at each other they unite against Abby. On every
episode the moms exact a comeuppance and Miss Abby is somehow
humiliated. Nevertheless, Miss Abby's girls almost always beat the rival Candy
Apples in competition so her tyranny is endured. While the moms on
Toddlers and Tiaras are more low rent than the dance moms, the show
actually springs for some music rights. Miss Abby's girls go through
their paces to public domain production music while the toddlers rock
it to Beyonce and Madonna tunes.
There are about ten reality shows I
keep an eye on. Even though TLC ostensibly stands for “The
Learning Channel” Toddlers and Tiaras is lower on the food chain
than even Hoarders, perhaps even Animal Hoarders. This week though I
learn of a spin-off that will make Toddlers and Tiaras seem like
Proust. Here Comes Honey Boo Boo focuses on kiddie pageant queen,
Alana Thompson, a stand out out on the last season of the show. The
pudgy contestant swills a concoction of Mountain Dew and Red Bull
that her mom refers to as “go-go juice” and is animated, to say
the least, for the judges. Mom defends her use of the energy
beverage. Most of the other kids get Pixie Stix, which are referred
to as pageant crack, but Alana, it is reported,consumed fourteen with
no sign of improved vivacity.
Here Comes Honey Boo Boo follows not
just Alana, but the whole family. Certain motifs seem to be
effective for reality show success. Poetic justice- like when the
mean girl gets her corvette repo-ed-is is good. People also like to
watch fat people. Really fat people. This makes other really fat
people feel less freakish and less fat people feel thinner. I don't
know how Honey Boo Boo is going to employ the device of justice being
served but this family gives Biggest Loser a run for the money. As insurance that the non-severely brain-damaged viewers will feel
superior to the Honey Boo Boo family, there are lots of arm farts, butt
jokes and genuine mud wallowing.
I wish that this genre of television
hadn't early on been dubbed “Reality TV” My kids frequently
instruct me that the shows I watch are all faked. What kind of moron
do they think I am? Maybe we wouldn't look down our noses so much if
it were called“Manipulative TV” It's real life playing out a
fantasy of itself in front of a camera. Everyone is acting. Most of
the characters aren't very good actors. But it is fascinating to
watch people create characters based on their selves. The choice to
indulge in such exhibitionism is very telling. Who, with an iota of
decency, would attempt to convince a fat family to wallow in mud?
What, short of the threat of torture by starvation, would convince a
fat family to wallow in mud?
There is a self righteous gratification
that comes from being embarrassed for another human being. I am embarrassed for myself, having typed here several times. "Honey Boo Boo." Despite
the association with ickiness, this genre's day will come. There is
an art to this manipulation of reality. No cover is blown when we acknowledge the cunning, relying on non-professional actors
no less, this manipulation requires. It takes is a special editor to
manipulate the manipulation to its best effect. Just like in
fictional TV, it's about character, tone, arc and setting. Even the
most naïve viewers see the artifice. There's karmic justice and
beau-coup blubber. Still, reality TV studies will inevitably become
part of the cannon. Then maybe my family won't give me so much grief
about watching crap.
4 comments:
I so pine for the days of yesteryear when I could actually learn something on TLC, the Discovery Channel made me think long after the TV was turned off, The History Channel went back to some former time and AMC was still playing B movies 24/7.
I sometimes get sucked into the "Reality Show" trap. It's usually when I'm traveling, sick, or both. It's free and on tap coast to coast. I like junk food, but I know that I can't live on this crap, especially since it celebrates, or shall I say wallows, in human greed, lust, pride, and stupidity. Always good fodder for good theater per Shakespeare. I know full well that the participants are being manipulated to boost the entertainment value. I know clever editing when I see it. The ultimate goal is to take the audience on a melodramatic roller coast ride, establishing heroes and villians along the way. It has it's roots in the Medicine Show and the Side Show. Yes, it's our modern day FREAK SHOW. This will certainly be the testing ground for many future makers of "Fictional Film and TV Shows". I recently watched the TV Movie, Cinema Verite, which is a dramatic look at what went on behind the scenes during the making of PBS's An American Family. If you haven't seen it, check it out. In the meantime, try to tapper off. Going cold turkey might be fatal.
They still make Pixie Stix? From the days of candy cigarettes, complete with lipstick marks--or was that the end that was lit? I got confused as a kid, inhaling.
I admit only that either Amber or Maci is/are hideous looking. Not sure which shows bloat, long after the post-partum depression. If she/they look/s like this as a teen, one wonders what the years on the "dating market" will add to her/their procreative luster.
Those dance shows drive me out of the room so I will never embarrass myself or you by admitting any detail of their content. Those Storage Wars showdowns puzzle me. Why do the nameless others even show up to try to bid? Do the buyers really make a profit if they only accumulate the merchandise for their own inventory at their own stores? Do folks watching rush out and hunt them down to buy whatever's displayed on the show, the day after? Why did a student tell me when his friend was one of the "experts" quizzed by a unit buyer from the show, the crew took all day to film what was a casual exchange of a few seconds on camera? If agents in Tinseltown exist to feed these shows with talking heads and tattooed skin, how real is "documentary" or "non-scripted" television?
I agree w/Cari's comment. What's left to learn when ice truckers, real housewives who look fake, hillbilly poachers, gypsy clans, and motorcycle nuts--all with tats and markedly downscale, down-home accents even if these supposedly fade away due to this same mass medium exposure--fill those few channels formerly given over to minimal 'edu-tainment'? What sociological subcategory's left?
A fly is buzzing around me as I type this so this is a brief missive. xxx me
Now John, don't be dissing on my Ice Road Truckers....
Post a Comment